![]() |
| Image created by the Partnership for 21st Century Skills |
Google the term, and you'll quickly learn that the United States Department of Education, along with countless partners in the US and around the world, are working hard to prepare "teachers for a 21st century classroom that not only incorporates, but demands, more focus on critical thinking, STEM, foreign language, collaborative problem-solving, and technology literacy."
Of course, these are all terrific skills to learn, though many (such as critical thinking, foreign languages, and collaborative problem solving) were already centuries old when they were espoused by folks like Socrates. And other skills listed in the graphic above -- life and career skills, for example -- are pretty much essential in order to survive in a modern society, so they're not really new either.
In fact, it's only the technology that's new. And what's -- at least in theory -- cutting edge is the idea that students should not only know how to access information online but should also know how to participate in the creation of online content. In an ideal world, of course, students would be using their newfound thinking and reasoning skills to create that online content, which would then generate intelligent conversation and collaboration.
But here's the rub: we seem to be conflating the technical ability to make a video and put it on YouTube with the intellectual ability to have an idea, think it through, develop an artistic vision to present that idea to others, develop a structure in which to present the idea, draft a creative presentation, edit it, and THEN present it to the world. In other words, we're rarely combining the thinking process with the technical ability to present content.
As a result, YouTube and other online venues are fast filling up with thousands upon thousands of "21st Century" presentations containing nothing more than whatever happened to be said or done when a student turned on a camera. Similarly, SlideShare is full of two-image PowerPoints with nothing to say... Flickr is loaded with photoshopped images created to please the "digital technology" teacher's aesthetic.
In short, for the most part, our kids are learning to make "stuff" and post it online.
Every now and then, though, a project comes along that actually pulls together critical thinking, collaboration, technology, and engagement in a way that has real significance both to the learners and to the larger world. In the process of doing some research for a client, I came upon a few such projects. All are project-based, technology-rich, and focused on real world problems -- either in the area of service learning or civics.
Perhaps most signficantly, not all such projects are actually school based: most are run by non-profits or corporations. Microsoft, for example, offers a World Citizenship award for a technological innovation designed to make a positive difference in the world. Museums, civics organizations, and even non-governmental organizations are jumping in, with a focus on real engagement, action, and outcomes.
As I delve more deeply into projects related to 21st century skills, I'll be writing occasional blogs on what I've learned. Here and there, I'm finding the real deal... when I do, I'll share it!

Dear Lisa Jo,
ReplyDeleteI am a substitute teacher (and freelance writer trying to get back into that field), and I couldn't agree more with what you wrote regarding the way in which our children are being taught today. My 16-year-old son, for example, is knowledgeable and conversant with You Tube and all of the other digital venues. However, I am not at all impressed with the way in which he is being taught to write (i.e., spelling, grammar, etc.) and think critically.
You are so right that being able to up- or down-load content onto the web is only a small part of the process of creating something unique and well-thought-through.
I would argue that this stems from the ridiculous emphasis on testing and "data" in our schools today. Here in Virginia, schools must not only contend with the "No Child Left Behind" stipulations, but, more importantly, with the "SOLs" ("Standards of Learning") state tests. Third-grade, fifth-grade, 8th-grade, and 10th-grade teachers are under incredible pressure to thoroughly cover the SOL "objectives." Teachers must, at all costs, teach "to the tests." I believe that the undue influence of these standardized tests, which are usually multiple-choice, "bubble" tests, are destroying any creativity in education today.
--Robyn Hyman
[rgh104@yahoo.com]